Montag, 1. Mai 2017

… we could sing better songs’ (Willy Russel, Educating Rita , 1980)





       Under the current government in England public education is about to go to seed. 
       Rereading Educating Rita in this context reminds us of values and ideals which 
       seem to have unjustly fallen into oblivion. 

In the drama Educating Rita by Willy Russel a young, married working class woman, who calls herself Rita but whose real name is Susan, enrols in a literature course at the Open University in order to discover herself. She arrives at the conclusion:  ‘[…] it´s given me more life than I´ve had in years, […] (p. 198).[1]
The final scenes show Rita truly enjoying cultural life and looking forward to a course she has been admitted to as a real student after passing her exam. Rita´s joy suggests that she has been successfully integrated into the world of the educated.
Nevertheless, the drama has a political subtext about social classes and social mobility. At times it reads like a case study on the predicament of an intelligent, open-minded young woman from the working classes in the late 1970s and accompanying issues of alienation and integration. [2]
At the beginning of her education, Rita is a wanderer between two worlds, the working class world she grew up in, where she still works as a hairdresser and which her husband completely identifies with, on the one hand and the university, the realm of the educated classes and where she is an outsider, on the other. When she attends her weekly tutorial on campus she is painfully aware that the ordinary students are much better equipped for their studies than she is. However, she trusts her tutor Frank, not only because as an alcoholic he is an outsider, too, but because he is open-minded and respectful and even grateful because she makes him see things in a different light from before.
(‘I think you´re the first breath of air that´s been in this room for years.’ p. 180)

Rita´s immersion in the world of the educated, however, does not come without a price. As time goes by her aspiration alienates her from her family, and she has to realize that the alienation is mutual and that her two worlds are incompatible. Here, the drama throws a critical light on the working classes, too. Whereas Rita is convinced that studying literature is worthwhile, her husband refuses to go along with her ideas and plans. He is scared of losing her and goes so far as to burn her books. In her analysis, her efforts make him feel ashamed of his way of life and put the blame on him for not taking action himself. ‘He hates me coming here. It´s like drug addicts, isn´t it? They hate it when one of them tries to break away.’ P. 195 Thus, not external circumstances are seen as the cause of his dissatisfaction but lack of purpose and fear of change.[3]
Besides not fitting into the working class world any more, Rita feels that she does not belong in the world of the educated either. ‘I can´t talk to the people I live with any more. An´ I can´t talk to the likes of them on Saturday or them out there, because I can´t learn the language.’ (p. 208) When she is invited to a dinner party at Frank´s house she wants nothing more than to attend, but she is scared that she would be perceived as an oddity instead of an equal, that the other guests would be amused by her appearance, her way of speaking and her behaviour rather than take her seriously. While Frank appreciates her otherness, she wishes nothing more than to blend in.
Both the resistance Rita faces within her community and her fear of being laughed at by the educated give a vivid and realistic impression of the workings of the class system which in some of its manifestations has not only persisted until today but has even been reinforced. 
Although Rita´s story bears traces of social romanticism, it is not utterly unthinkable. The climate of the times encouraged young people from the working classes to study at university. ‘Between 1962 and the 1990s higher education in Britain was effectively free, as the state paid students’ tuition fees and also offered maintenance grants to many.’[4]
Even though for Rita studying at university implies having less money and time, a university education appears to be an attainable aim. Being an outcast from her childhood environment is certainly the highest price Rita has to pay. She trades off belonging for a more satisfactory life.
Rita´s story is intriguing, and it makes us wish that many people could be offered such an enriching experience in their lives.   
As her story is clearly embedded in the circumstances of the late 1970s, the question poses itself how Rita would fare in the social reality of today.To an external observer Great Britain today does not present itself as the open-minded society which facilitates or even promotes social mobility on a larger scale. It even seems that the divide between the social classes is harder to cross.
The defensive attitude of the underprivileged in the face of change displayed by Rita´s husband, has likely strengthened. All over Europe and the US it takes the form of pride in one´s way of life and correspondingly a rejection of learning and upward mobility. The elites, in particular intellectuals such as scientists or journalists, are not role models any more but targets of hatred. These emotions culminated in the rise of UKIP and the Brexit vote in 2016 and might have a strong hold on a young lower class woman.
The development outlined so far coincides with a shift in the hierarchy of needs in western industrial nations. Whereas in the late 20th century individualism was a predominant value, and self-actualisation - in Rita´s words finding or discovering oneself - was of prime importance, the need to belong to and identify with a particular community seems to have taken hold of large parts of the population of western countries in the early 21st century.  This makes it even less likely for a young woman to leave her community.
If a young woman like Rita still felt attracted to studying literature in 2017, she would certainly have to struggle with higher obstacles, because circumstances have changed radically in the last decade. The Conservative Government has raised tuition fees for English universities to about 9200 £ a year so that now they are the highest in the world. [5] With her wages as a hairdresser it would simply be impossible to save up so much money! Of course, she might consider taking out a student loan, but paying it off with interest would burden her for many years.

Of course, it is understandable that if austerity measures have to be implemented, higher education can´t be completely spared. With the English government withdrawing almost completely from public funding of university places, however, social mobility will undoubtedly be obstructed.
Ultimately, such a policy does not serve the common good because modern liberal societies benefit from a well-educated population and England is no exception.  In order to prevent frustration and hopelessness from spreading among those with little chance of advancement, the current policy should be reversed and replaced by one which promotes equality of opportunity and actively encourages people from all walks of life to educate themselves.
Only with a new openness in all strata of society can the division between the social classes begin to be healed. The foundation for this is laid with a good public school system which however is about to go to seed with the looming funding cuts and competition with (private) free schools that are equally funded by the government. 

In summary, in the political climate of today Educating Rita can remind us that a good public education (both secondary and higher education) ought to be accessible to everyone independent of social origin not only because it improves one´s chances in life but because it is conducive to a satisfactory life, to responsible citizenship and thus to social peace from which society as a whole benefits. Consequently, schools and universities deserve generous public funding.


[1] Willy Russel (1986) Educating Rita, Stags & Hens and Blood Brothers. Two plays and a musical. London: Methuen.
[2] In fact, the drama draws on the author´s own experience.
[3] Educating Rita is based on the author´s experience.
[4] http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/university-fees-in-historical-perspective

[5] In Scotland higher education is free of charge for Scottish students, in Wales and Northern Ireland tuition fees amount to less than half the sum for English universities.

Freitag, 31. März 2017

Poem for April: 'All that is gold' by J.R.R. Tolkien



           
This is the Poem composed by the hobbit Bilbo[1] about Aragorn, 
one of the protagonists of The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien, 1949

            
            All that is gold does not glitter,

            Not all those who wander are lost;

            The old that is strong does not wither,

            Deep roots are not reached by the frost.


            From the ashes a fire shall be woken,
           
            A light from the shadows shall spring;

            Renewed shall be blade that was broken,

            the crownless again shall be king.
         
           
            Poem about Aragorn from The Lord of the Rings, 1937-1949
            by J.R.R. Tolkien

           

Originally, I posted this poem as a ‘Poem of the Month’ because I am enchanted by the first four lines celebrating hidden, unexpected worth and strength behind an unpretentious appearance. Lines 5 and 6 appeal to me because I feel drawn to the theme of light emerging from or despite darkness and hopelessness. However, the main theme of the poem is the praise of and hope for a redeemer figure which has its place in the book, but which personally I do not want to be suspected of. So I decided to explain its context.

The poem has the character of a riddle referring to Aragorn without mentioning him by name. It is recited twice  - in Gandalf´s letter to Frodo in which he urges him to venture on his journey immediately and by Bilbo during the White Council at Rivendell - each time with the aim of convincing the audience of Aragorn´s true identity and significance.
The first four lines are proverbial statements which describe him in his current existence.[2] His modest unsettled life as a so-called Ranger and his appearance - he is described as looking old several times - mislead uninitiated characters who do not respect him very much. Their unsuspecting attitude enables him to remain undercover and facilitates his mission to pre-empt and counter the spread of Sauron´s evil power.
According to the poem Aragorn is incorruptible like the noble metal gold which resists corrosion. He is strong despite his age, and extreme circumstances can´t knock him off course or weaken his resolve.
The final four lines foreshadow Aragorn´s role in the fight against the Dark Lord Sauron and culminate in the prophecy of his destiny of becoming King of Gondor and the ‘Western World’.[3] They can be understood as referring to the previous war against Sauron which resulted in Sauron´s defeat. In this war Aragorn´s ancestor Elendil died and his sword broke. Simultaneously, the lines point to the looming danger posed by the evil currently emanating and spreading from Sauron (‘the shadow’) who has regained strength, to the devastation it causes and the hope for a new and better world. One prediction of the poem comes true early on at Rivendell, when Elendil´s sword, whose shards Aragorn has inherited, is indeed renewed before the Fellowship of the Ring set out on their mission. (p. 276)

Although the poem is expressive of worship for a redeemer figure, The Lord of the Rings on the whole clearly advocates the renunciation of absolute power and takes the side of those who resist temptation and forego the chance to grab the ‘One Ring’ which symbolizes it. The option that a strong character fighting on the side of good might lead their cause to victory by appropriating the ring is dismissed as an illusion underestimating the power of the ring.
After Boromir suggested during the White Council that they use the ring as a weapon to defeat Sauron Elrond sums up its power.
‘Alas, no,’ said Elrond. ‘We cannot use the Ruling Ring. That we now know too well. It belongs to Sauron and was made by him alone, and is altogether evil. Its strength, Boromir, is too great for anyone to wield at will, save only those who have already a great power of their own. But for them it holds an even deadlier peril. The very desire of it corrupts the heart. Consider Saruman. If any of the Wise should with this ring overthrow the Lord of Mordor, using his own arts he would then set himself on Sauron´s throne, and yet another dark Lord would appear.’ Position 5695, S. 267
That the ring even has this effect on innately good characters with a high level of integrity becomes evident when Frodo offers the ring to the elf queen Galadriel who is sorely tempted to accept it. When Sam repeats the offer saying ‘You´d put things to rights’, she declines because she is aware that she would be overwhelmed and possessed by its evil powers in the long run, too. ‘That´s how it would begin. But it would not stop with that, alas! We will not speak more of it.’ S. 366
As they can´t find anyone to entrust the Ring to – even Gandalf admits that he is tempted by it - the White Council (S. 357) decides that the best way to defeat the Dark Lord Sauron for good would be to destroy it which can only be done by carrying it back to its origin and throwing it into the fires of the Dark Mountain (Mount Doom).
They assign this task to the hobbit Frodo because they consider him to be in least danger of claiming power for himself. Furthermore Sauron underestimates hobbits and thus Frodo is most likely to approach Mount Doom unnoticed. Nevertheless, he often struggles to resist Sauron´s power which makes itself felt through the ring. In the end the ring can only be destroyed because Frodo´s servant and friend Sam is unconditionally faithful to Frodo and his cause and because luck is on their side.
The Lord of the Rings further illustrates the psychology of power when supposedly strong allies against Sauron yield to his evil influence in various ways. Saruman, who used to be a highly esteemed member of the White Council, covets the ring himself and has already levied his own army. Leaders like Théoden, King of Rohan, and Denethor, Steward of Gondor, are about to fall prey to Sauron by losing their fighting spirit after they had contact with him. Whereas Théoden changes his mind after his evil counsellor Wormtongue is removed, Denethor finally kills himself in despair. He neither sees hope for victory nor does he really wish it as Aragorn´s return would deprive him of his power over Minas Tirith. Gandalf´s comment is: ‘Even in the heart of our stronghold the enemy has power to strike us: for his will it is that is at work.’ p. 850
Although Lord of the Rings is first of all a fantasy novel, its topicality with regard to recent history is evident as leading politicians who started out as reformers of their countries have turned into authoritarian rulers. As the example of Russia shows, the rule of law is practically abolished and the political system is tuned to the advantage of a small economic and political elite.
The same holds true for Turkey and its President who has just been granted additional powers in a referendum whereas parliament has been degraded and the position of the Prime Minister abolished which is tantamount to the abolition of the division of powers. The attempted coup d` état of summer 2016 has served as a justification to fire thousands of teachers, state officials and judges and to label critics as terrorists who must be detained. Not least, the warlike attitude of both the Turkish and the Russian government serves to divert the attention of the population from economic hardship.

Of course, it would be black and white thinking to compare these rulers with Sauron in The Lord of the Rings but the tendency to maximise their power not for the sake of the common good but for the sake of power itself is evident. In George Orwells 1984 this is designated the hallmark of all dictatorships:

'Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. […] We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.'
George Orwell, 1984


[1] Bilbo is the protagonist of the fantasy novel The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien, 1937

[2] Besides being Aragorn´s friend, Bilbo is the chronicler of the events of the fictional world, and he knows Aragorn´s genealogy and the legend about the destiny in store for him.